Our cookies

We use cookies, which are small text files, to improve your experience on our website.
You can allow or reject non essential cookies or manage them individually.

Reject allAllow all

More options  •  Cookie policy

Our cookies

Allow all

We use cookies, which are small text files, to improve your experience on our website. You can allow all or manage them individually.

You can find out more on our cookie page at any time.

EssentialThese cookies are needed for essential functions such as logging in and making payments. Standard cookies can’t be switched off and they don’t store any of your information.
AnalyticsThese cookies help us collect information such as how many people are using our site or which pages are popular to help us improve customer experience. Switching off these cookies will reduce our ability to gather information to improve the experience.
FunctionalThese cookies are related to features that make your experience better. They enable basic functions such as social media sharing. Switching off these cookies will mean that areas of our website can’t work properly.

Save preferences

pigs faceMore than just a 'Hayday'

 

Year: 2021

Alice Armstrong
University of Leeds, UK

Supervisor(s): Professor Lisa Collins


 

Supplementary environmental enrichment (EE) has been linked to limiting aggression and depressive sow behaviors. This four-week study explored changing behaviors and lesion scores in two separated groups of sows at the University of Leeds National Pig Centre. The control was provided with standard enrichment. The treatment was exposed to straw and the additional EE ‘EasyFixAstro 200’ toys. Ethograms were used when recording behavioral data sourced from video recordings. Lesion scores were collected for pigs from each section. Firstly, a Poisson regression analysis was conducted within SPSS. Response variables were the ethogram behavioral markers, the predictors were sow group, and day. Motion and environmental nosing were both significantly lower in the control group (p=0.00, p<0.01). Lying was significantly higher in the control group (p=0.00, p<0.01). Hence, sows exposed to additional enrichment were more active than the sows exposed to the standard enrichment. An ordinal probit generalized linear model was applied in SPSS for the lesion score data. The response variable was lesion score, and the predictors were the day, sow ID and sow group. The lesion scores were significantly higher in the control group (p=0.02, p<0.05). Therefore, sows exposed to the additional enrichment had significantly lower physical markers of aggression. Thus, additional enrichment is an invaluable instrument in lessening negative byproducts of housing sows.